WHAT ARE THE LAWS AGAINST CYBER SQUATTING? Cyber Squatting in India . A complete analysis of cyber squatting and laws. Overview of cybersquatting laws in India and famous cases involving cyber squatters. Case and legal action can be taken against. What is cybersquatting? Cybersquatting or domain-name hijacking refers to the practice of bad faith registration of a domain name under the.
|Published (Last):||24 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||9.17 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.52 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It went on to state that a domain name is much more than an xybersquatting address and as such, is entitled to protection equal to that afforded cybefsquatting a registered trademark.
Bad faith intent described shall not be found in any case in which the court determines that the person believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the use of the domain name was a fair use or otherwise lawful.
Congratulations, you are a cybersquatter. Such users could well conclude that the first domain name owner had mis-represented its goods or services through its promotional activities and the first domain owner would thereby lose their customer.
The court held as domain names are valuable corporate assets, they are entitled to trademark equivalent protection. Section provides penalty for the applying of false trademarks i. Later, on hearing about the cause, the search giants doubled his reward. The plaintiffs should have an option of obtaining statutory damages this will act as an important tool for the trademark holders in protecting their intellectual property in the online world.
A complaint was brought to WIPO and the Administrative Panel found that the defendant registered the domain name in bad faith.
Interested in the next Webinar on this Topic? The Court in Case Supra further observed that. Though incia names are not defined under any Indian law or are covered under any special enactment, the Courts in India has applied Trade Marks Act, to such cases.
Recent years have seen a steep rise in cybersquatting cases across India, whose e-commerce industry is continuously growing. The Policy has been formulated in line with internationally accepted guidelines, and with the relevant provisions of the Indian Information Technology Act Internet Protocol IP addresses, which consist of a string of numbers separated by periods, are used to identify Internet sites.
The numbers referred to above are linked with the domain name “rs.
Cybersquatting has increased drastically in the last decade and has devastating effects on the rights of Intellectual Property holders. However, in the case of Satayam Infoway v.
Cyber Squatting Laws In India – Intellectual Property – India
Cybersquatting is a primary concern specifically for the domains having financial transaction because of the lndia squatters taking benefit in robbing and fooling individuals by obtaining their Credit Card details.
Thus, this increases the customers search costs and makes it more likely that the customer will become frustrated with the trademark owner, regardless of the quality of her products or services. The domain name serve same function as the indiaa and is not a mere address or like finding number of the Internet and, Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to equal protection ihdia trade mark.
A cyersquatting name is easy to remember and use, and is chosen as an instrument of commercial enterprise not only because it facilitates the ability of consumers to navigate the Internet to find websites they are looking for, but also at the same time, serves to identify and distinguish the business itself, or its good or services, and to specify its corresponding online Internet location. Like in other cases under Trademarks Act, two kind cybersquattijg reliefs are available: The traditional test of likelihood of confusion was first applied by the US courts in the case of Comp Examiner Agency v.
It takes about two months for a WIPO case to be resolved, with a small fee to be made. Remedy of Passing off: A German man called Mathias Stricker sold yoga. Login with your social accounts: News About this Firm. More from this Firm.
The other famous Yahoo case, the U. They serve to identify the source of goods and services, such as: Home General Laws against Cyber Squatting. Remedy of infringement 2. Cybersquatting is a virus for which there is an urgent need of developing or finding an effective Anti-dote in form of efficient laws otherwise this virus can turn into a plague encouraging the cybersquatters to prey on vulnerable Domain Name Holders.
There are two levels of domain, i. Using a search engine will inconvenience the consumer, because he may possibly have to wade through cybersquaatting of other sites to get to the desired site. In this dispute solving mechanism the arbitration takes place online. In such cases, the cybersquatters register that particular domain name in their name.
Cybersquatting cases: India
A trademark is protected by the laws of a country where such trademark may be registered. This may occur in e-commerce with its rapid progress and instant and the erotically limitless accessibility to users and potential customers and particularly so in areas of specific overlap. The High Court of Delhi passed an order restraining the defendant from using Yahoo as their trademark or domain name and using the same code that infringe imdia copyrights.
Food, Drugs, Cybersquattng, Life Sciences.
Did you find this blog post helpful? Subscribe so that you never miss another post! Foreigners have also capitalized on Indian domain names. Events from this Firm.
A domain name refers to the name of a website and the address by using which Internet users can have access to a particular website. In an Internet service, a particular Internet site could be reached by anyone anywhere in the world who proposes to visit the said Internet site. UDRP may also be referred to as a legally qualified specific contract term.
Patents Amendment Rules, Witness Protection Scheme in India. Witness Protection Scheme in India. The Indian Courts though have recognized the lacuna, however, in the absence of a explicit legislation, courts apply provisions of the Trade Marks Act to such disputes.