October 17, 2020

Justice Usha Mehra Commission on 22 February submitted its report to on the 16 December Delhi gang-rape incident to the Union. held on were noted and approved by the Commission. Agenda Item No Recommendations of Justice Usha Mehra. Committee Report regarding. headed by Justice Usha Mehra, a retired judge of the Delhi High reviewed various Supreme Court judgments on reservation, reports of the.

Author: Meztizshura Kajik
Country: Seychelles
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 5 June 2012
Pages: 254
PDF File Size: 6.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.13 Mb
ISBN: 317-4-87587-249-2
Downloads: 58780
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Faugul

But, the Commission’s approach from inception appears that it had taken up the responsibility to categorise the SCs without proper application of mind and with a prejudice influenced by the political clout at the behest of the Hon’ble Minister for Social Justice and Empowerment and the Government of Andhra Pradesh which is espousing the cause of MRPS.

Justice Usha Mehra Commission Submitted its Report to the Union Government of India

The schedule castes are not jjustice as commission is trying to portray. Hence the report of the Commission is unilateral, irrational and unreasonable. It was not suggested to categorise the SCs. The Commission failed to note and appreciate that if one caste is little advantaged because of their early schooling or on account of the missionaries starting schools in Coastal areas, it should not be a ground to divide the whole SCs.

The recommendation of the Commission that the State Legislature based on the recommendations of the Judicial Commission, shall indicate specifically as to what percentage of reservation benefits shall be given to which caste, races or tribes of SCs or part of or group within in any caste, races or tribes thereof based on their population ratio implies that the State should appoint another judicial commission to carryout the same exercise before taking any further actionbased on the report.

It commossion not clear and it is very ambiguous and bereft of necessary details. Justiice to which, all the Scheduled Castes including sub-castes, sub-groups they constitute one groupwhich are homogeneous and belong commissiin one caste for the purpose of the Constitution.

Chennaiah’s case and to examine the Constitutional, Statutory and Legal ramifications.

As per censusthe population of Adi-andhra group wasand as per censusit was whereas as per census, the population of Adi-andhra shown as only Justice Usha Mehra Commission reports that there was an unanimous resolution by the State Legislature dated, 10 th December We, on behalf of the Association for Social Action, Andhra Pradesh an intellectual group of Scheduled Caste officers endeavoring for the promotion of Welfare, developement and unity among the Scheduled castes, present the following objections on the report mehhra by Justice Usha Mehra Commission on with an appeal to consider the issue in a fair, just, objective and dispassionate manner.

  AIA A701 PDF

Thus, studying the status of SCs for division in Andhra Pradesh is thus violative of equality enshrined in the Constitution and discriminatory. For instance, in A. Thus, the whole exercise of the Commission is futile. Thus the suggested Remedy is worse than the Disease. The mehda amendment to Article is itself unconstitutional and against the original intendment of the founding fathers of the Constitution that no subsequent notification shall alter or vary the castes specified in the list which is the spirit of the Constitution cannot be tinkered with by way of an amendment to the Constitution which is impermissible.

While working out the proportionality on the basis of the population, the conclusions of the report are crucial. Or whether the reservations are to be appointed based on the region etc.


Further, in Andhra Pradesh, the State is divided into six zones. The Commission did not bother even to study the implications of the judgement nor discussed anywhere in the report about the findings of the Supreme Court and the remedies suggested by the Supreme Court.

The Commission also failed to note and want only ignored the fact that B.

All News Videos Photos. Selecting a few and collecting data from insufficient number and through random surveys we cannot expect a fair and just conclusions. But, for the purpose of population adi-andhras are shown separately.

Muniswamy pillai is out of context and the Commission ignored the very fact that the test for inclusion in the list of SCs is extreme social, educational and economic backwardness arising out of traditional practice of untouchability. They are land less agricultural laboureres living by seeking alms or by weaving, tanning, manufacturing of footwear, animal husbandry. The report of the Justice Mehra Commission is not only illegal, and unconstitutional but also opposed the judgement of the Supreme Court Constitutional bench in Dr.

Hence, rsport report is inaccurate and inconsistent nehra the Census figures. It also failed to review the position of about 30, backlog vacancies which are not filled up in the State. Sources said the Home Ministry has accepted several of the recommendations of the panel and re;ort were placed before the Cabinet for final approval.


The Commission also committed error in selecting a few jkstice for sample study and a limited number of Government departments judtice agencies identified and selected by the Government which is out and out supporting the cause of MRPS. The information furnished is one-sided and in many cases they are cooked up and fabricated to prove its point of view.

The issue of Scheduled Castes is a National issue and the reservations are intended for constitutional purpose. Thus it is prejudicial, pre-determined, pre- judged and the recommendation for sub classification mejra Scheduled Castes is a foregone conclusion.

Thus, the recommendation of the Commission for categorization is contradictory and against its own findings.

Thus, the observations particularly made with reference to Malas, that commision Malas, Madigas are mehar has no basis and irrelevant and biased and motivated. The Commission did not even bother to consider the observations of the Supreme Court that categorization is no solution to the problem and the remedy suggested by way of special courses etc.

Thus, quoting Indrashaney’s case for categorization of SCs is untenable. The Commission’s observation about certain Scheduled Castes are contradictory to each other.

TomorrowMakers Let’s get smarter about money. There will be no need for any complaint if these schemes are implemented for the individual benefit and for the area developement as contemplated.

Justice Usha Mehra Commission Submitted its Report to the Union Government of India

Justice Mehra Commission was only asked to examine the various facets of the demand for sub-categorisation of SCs. It is a fact that there are still lakhs of SCs children who are not admitted to schools in spite of Sarva Siksha Abhiyan Scheme and there is inadequate enrollment of students at all the levels and when the scholarships are not fully utilized by any District under any scheme, and the dropout rate of Scheduled Castes students, which is alarming.

In respect of Bindla, a satellite not share wells and common burial ground with other communities.